Dear Sun editors, readers and IPSO,
What a mainstream publication opts to put on its front page can be very telling.
Take the Sun called by others the Scum and worse.
This week as Hillsborough inquest verdicts of unlawful killing were returned the British media ran that as a headline, front page story but not the Sun.
The Sun posted a story about David Cameron.
The Sun of course posted a terrible front page full of accusations against Liverpool fans when 96 died in a football crush April 15, 1989; four years ago they ran an apology.
They have since blamed information received by police from the scene but only the Sun stuck by the story of drunken fans urinating on the injured and dying.
So you will not be alone if you think that the Sun should have been leading the charge when unlawful killing verdicts were returned this week and in doing so adding a heartfelt apology.
Since the Hillsborough inquests verdict though Ken Livingstone has been suspended from the Labour Party and a smear campaign against some in the party highlights political opportunism at its worst.
And the Sun has done it again.
Friday the Sun posted "Ken Livingstone’s shock claim: I can’t be an anti-Semite because I've romped with Jewish women."
A shocking statement if it was true but in the text of their report the Sun says:
The leftie said hours before Labour suspended him for a Hitler rant: “It’s absurd to call me an anti-Semite, as two of my ex-girlfriends are Jewish.”
Not the best choice of words from Ken or the Sun.
A leftie shows clear bias but it is posted as news not an opinion piece.
Look at the original title of the Sun piece which is shown below in their URL and that surely smacks of anti Semitism-"Ken Livingstone shock claim I can't be anti Semitic I've had it oy vey Jewish girls."
Someone in the editorial team obviously thought better of that headline and switched to 'romp' which is still inaccurate.
Those on the right wing of British politics are working to oust the first truly left-wing leader of the Labour party in years.
Those leaning away from the left but part of the Labour party are joining in.
The Sun is either playing politics or aiming for increasing its circulation.
It is one publication featuring in many shops; that means whether you read it or not you may encounter its front page.
And in the end mud sticks and if and when the Sun apologises it usually opts for a small retraction that is not on its front page.
Time the Sun followed its other Murdoch publication The News of the World and shut up shop.
Op-Ed: This is a tale of two Suns but it has nothing to do with heavenly bodies. These Suns are owned by one media mogul namely Rupert Murdoch; we are of course referring to the Tory rag the Sun newspaper and its publications North and South of the Scottish border.
In this tale of two Suns the Scottish version is backing the SNP but south of the border the English Sun supports the Tories and prefers to demonise the SNP.
If political pundits have called the May 7 General Election correctly Labour will be all but wiped out in Scotland; if that happens the big political winner north of the border will be the SNP, or Scottish National Party.
It seems certain that the majority of Scottish voters will not elect the Tories; the Scots have shown good sense down the years and turned their backs on the Tories.
But what happens in Scotland could and most probably will impact on the result south of the border.
If Labour lose big time in Scotland, as predicted, they will likely struggle to get the majority needed to receive the keys to Number 10.
It is not rocket science and all of this means that the Tories want the SNP to win seats from Labour in Scotland and so does Mr Murdoch it seems; so the Tories have been demonising SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon in the minds of English voters even though the SNP only has candidates in Scotland.
The cunning plan is that the SNP would be needed to help Labour form a government if they have no majority and scaremongering English voters will stop them voting Labour.
A Ukip Conservative right-wing coalition government is on the cards but it will depend on how the numbers stack up.
The Sun's duplicity puts a whole new spin of the heavily financed Tory propaganda machine working overtime in 2015.
Our image from the Guardian shows the Scottish and English Suns very different front page spreads both aimed at attacking Labour and diminishing their vote.
While the Sun is derided by many people in the UK it has a wide circulation with many readers still blindly believing it is impartial.