NEWTEKWORLDNEWS
Menu

Open letter to Iain McNicol Labour party NEC

31/1/2016

27 Comments

 
PictureMcNicol
Friends and comrades, it seems there is another enemy to fight if we are truly going to take back the party for the people. The enemy is the NEC.

I have sent a letter to Iain McNicol leader.

Stating my concerns I am posting the letter on here, in the hope that you will all be aware that with the NEC election coming up you can encourage your own CLP [Constituency Labour Party] to put forward a candidate that is Pro Jeremy.

To Iain McNicol

As a member of the Labour Party and having voted Labour since the age of 18, a full 36 years in total, even through the debacle of the Blair years, I sat back and watched a party that my grandparents and parents fought for, be taken apart by a man and his cabinet and made into a pale blue tory party.

The party started to dismantle the unions; it turned its back on the working class and the poor.

I like many others thought the Labour Party was finished.

I watched as the media and his own party members demolished a good man in Ed Miliband.

Then Jeremy Corbyn came on the scene; a man of honesty, ideals and principals; unbelievable in a politician I know.

A true man of the people.

He is prepared to take on the government and win; which he is doing every week; despite the hurdles his own cabinet is putting in his way.

I feel hopeful for the first time in years.

Although the media in all forms are trying their hardest to discredit him, his shoulders are wide and his resolve is strong.

I expected opposition from The Progress part of the party and Labour First as these MP’s are careerist and want a job for life without having to work too hard on behalf of the people who voted them in with the added bonus of totally discounting the opinions of their constituents, {ergo the vote on Syria}.

They then had the audacity of calling foul when those said constituents tackled them about it; bleating to the press that they are being bullied.

At the same time, they thought it was reasonable to attack members who support Mr Corbyn, calling them Marxist, communist and other derogatory names. They chose to resign over the sacking of a man {Dugher} who had shown incredible disloyalty to his Leader and to the members.

They all think it’s reasonable to run to the press every chance they have and bleat how unfair life is to them. (They should try living in the real world and see how unfair life really can be).

Do these people not understand loyalty?

Behaving in this shabby way is not only disloyal to the leader but also to the MEMBERS.

Are we not the people that voted Jeremy Corbyn in on the biggest mandate in history and is it not a fact that more people have joined the party since he was elected on his policies?

I know in time The Progress Party will realise that it was their policies that lost us the last two elections and that the Blair ideology doesn’t sit well with the VOTERS.

The reason I am writing to you is the disloyalty the NEC and Labour First are showing to Mr Corbyn but more importantly it is the disloyalty to the members {the VOTERS}.

Having secret meetings behind the leaders' back, attacking his policies and trying to find ways and means to bring about his down fall. Only electing members who support the Progress party or are part of Labour First; having vetted where their loyalties lay first.

I was under the impression that the NEC was neutral to party politics; it would seem I was wrong.

As a powerful group within the Labour party I would have expected you to have openness and clarity and not operate under a cloak of secrecy. This is surely something that needs to be addressed at conference and the rules made fairer and more reflective of the opinions of the members.

After all isn’t that what DEMOCRACY is all about?

We have party within a party - a Progress Party. A group that calls themselves Labour First - whose aim is to cause the downfall of Mr Corbyn. And a very powerful group The NEC - whose members seem to be made up of the above two groups - who have secret meetings with the intention of blocking policies and to deliberately block any move that Mr Corbyn makes that they don’t want to go along with.

In anyone’s book that is not DEMOCRATIC.

What you all have forgotten is that the Labour Party is growing fast and becoming stronger every day, not because of Mr Corbyn but because of his policies.
  • The ones that reflect the needs of the people, all people, the poor, the vulnerable and the working poor.
  • The policies that will bring back into public ownership the assets this government has sold to their friends at prices way below their worth.
  • The policies that will make sure our firemen, policemen and soldiers have the right equipment that will help to keep them safe, while working for their country.
  • Policies that will put the NHS back on its feet and not in the hands of corporations that just bleed it dry.

When Mr Corbyn retires the movement will still be strong and will move forwards with true SOCIALIST policies.

If you do remove Mr Corbyn I and thousands of others will leave the Labour Party.

What all of you who still resist the move to the left and insist on following Blair’s ideology don’t realise is you risk losing the jobs you are all desperately clinging to.

We the members want change.

What I suggest we all do is come together and be a Party that can put this country back on its feet again, become a nation with a second to none manufacturing base, an NHS that will once again be envied by the world, where the poor, vulnerable and disabled are not considered criminals.

Together we can be Great again but if you all carry on as you are we will lose the election in 2020.

And we will be looking at the parties within a party for the loss.

We need to stop the in-fighting, debate the policies behind closed doors and at hustings and CLP meetings but not in the media.

Let’s all move forward as ONE.

Yours Sincerely. Karen Meanwell and Joanne Sinton

27 Comments

Oliver Letwin failing mental health

26/1/2016

1 Comment

 
Picture
Matt Kynaston United Kingdom

Op-ed: "Anger is a fuel. Anger is meant to be listened to, Anger is a voice, a shout, a plea, a demand. Anger is meant to be respected. Why? Because Anger is a map. Anger shows us where our boundaries are. It lets us see where we have been and lets us know where we want to go. Anger points the way, not the finger. Anger is meant to be acted upon, not acted out.” Julia Cameron, 1993.

On Wednesday January 20, 2016, I attended an evening featuring a keynote speech by Mr Oliver Letwin, Conservative MP for Dorset West, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and responsible for the oversight of the Cabinet Office.

I decided to use the opportunity to once again raise the call for mental health.

The event, hosted by Tory-funded ‘liberal conservative pressure group’ Bright Blue, was billed as a discussion focussing on “Opportunity For All”. When booking my tickets, I assumed (correctly) that the event was likely to involve examples of how the government was working to ensure equal opportunities for all people regardless of background.

PictureAt the event
This was undoubtedly organised as a way of winning over middle ground voters, and maybe even as part of an effort to clean up Mr Letwin’s recently marred public image.

Ideology first

The 45 minute speech on conservative ideals was an eye opener to me, as I had never heard it straight from the source. If you aren’t aware, the concept is that we should all be striving to write the “story of our own lives” and that no-one should be held back from achieving their dreams and thus we “liberate the human spirit”. I agree, working hard and being ambitious is awesome, however, I find it even more liberating when I am also conscious to the many incredible “stories” being written around me, and indeed the greater story that we play a small part of. Conservatism, I discovered, is a little too ego-centric for my liking. I guess that makes me “left-leaning”?

Takin’ it to the man

After this speech, I was the first of the audience to raise my hand to ask a question. I put it to Mr Letwin that the government was failing to deal with our rising mental health issues.

Despite the government’s numerous promises for increased investment, all the evidence (below) is showing us that vital funding and support is not being made available to mental health services on the NHS, and that these issues are being largely neglected. That combined with the fact that the government has now stopped publishing how much it spends and where this spend is allocated (information only accessible via Freedom of Information requests), means it is now even harder to hold the government to account, when it shouldn’t be.

Mr Letwin replied typically (and disappointingly) by heralding all the great achievements done in the past to address mental health, but said that there was still a lot more to do.

You can listen to the full exchange here.

What is actually happening…

The ideas of “big society” and “opportunity for all” are noble, however they can only work in practice when we all have the same access to basic and necessary healthcare.

After six-years of a Conservative led government the signs are bleak where our NHS is concerned. Indeed, when telling us to focus on our individualistic aspirations, one has to ask where a collectivist institution like the NHS fits? Is that why we are seeing increasingly more of it sold off and privatised?

Just some of the depressing facts about our collective state of mental health:
  • The number of people becoming so ill they had to be detained under the Mental Health Act leapt by 10% in the past year.
  • The number of children being treated on adult mental health wards – something that the Mental Health Act rightly says should not happen at all – rose again in 2015.
  • Suicide is the highest it has been since 2001.
  • We are in the midst of a psychiatry recruitment crisis: there has been a 94% increase in vacant and unfilled consultant posts.
What the government is (or not) doing:
  • Government has pledged to spend £600million in mental health services. However, that is only a returning on spending levels we had in 2010.
  • NHS trusts’ income for mental health services has actually dropped by 8.25% in real terms over past five years.
  • The Government committed to £250m on child and adolescent mental health services or CAMHS for 2015/16, but the Government has admitted there will be a £77m shortfall on what they have pledged.
  • In 2014/15 funding for mental health trusts was cut by 20% more than that for other hospitals.
  • A King’s Fund report published in November 2015 found that just 14% of people felt that they received appropriate care in a crisis.
There is even mounting evidence that government policy is harming our collective mental health:
  • The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health recently concluded that the programme of reassessing people on disability benefits using the Work Capability Assessment was independently associated with an increase in suicides, self-reported mental health problems and antidepressant prescribing.
  • 83% of people surveyed by the charity, Mind, reported that the Work Programme made their mental health condition worse.
  • The latest statistics reveal that less than 9% of people with mental health problems receiving Employment and Support Allowance have been helped into a job by the Work Programme.
I was also very saddened to read just yesterday the miserable story about Frances McCormack, the latest to take her own life after the added pressures brought about by the government’s controversial “bedroom tax”.

Accountability (lack of)

Lack of accountability is also a big problem: we still have no clarity on the promised government spending. In fact you have to use a Freedom of Information request to find out how much Clinical Commissioning Groups were allocating to mental health. The findings are alarming: 67% of CCGs spent less than 10% of their budget on mental health. This is despite mental health accounting for 23% of the total burden of disease.

In 2011/12 total investment in mental health dropped for the first time in a decade. Perhaps unsurprisingly, that same year the Government stopped publishing how much it invests in mental health.

It simply is not good enough. One has to wonder at what point will this government start taking our health seriously.

So…

My question to you: Can individualistic/ capitalistic ideologies work when managing the public sector industries, like our National Health Service, where our quality of healthcare, safety and well-being (not profit) is the “bottom line”?

The latest results of a poll I started on YouGov:

I look forward to reading your comments below.

Check out the author Matt Kynaston here
Picture
And listen to Matthew via sound cloud
1 Comment

Time attacks on Corbyn were stopped, a call to arms

18/1/2016

4 Comments

 
Picture
Time attacks on Corbyn were stopped, a call to arms - we hereby give notice of a mainstream media boycott and this is why.

Blogging or writing on your own news based website seems ever more appealing, especially if you live in the UK and are not right-wing motivated politically.

BBC bias has reared its ugly head since Jeremy Corbyn was elected Labour party leader on September 12, 2015 but the Beeb is not alone.

Regular right-wing reporting continues on Murdoch publications like The Sun and The Times but there are others; the Daily Telegraph lives up to its nickname of the Torygraph, day in and day out.

But the attacks on Corbyn in the media and furthered in the House of Commons at PMQs each Wednesday, when this veteran politician Mr Corbyn is bullied, shouted down and disrespected while his voice is drowned out are not acceptable.

This week's pantomime from parliament, with Mr Corbyn treat like a dastardly villain in a children's show, and speakers who followed on allowed due respect, rattled so many people in the UK that we are sending out a call to arms-not a call for violence but rather peaceful protest in a boycott of all mainstream media reporting.

Details of the date and time of the first day of action will follow and will be accompanied by details of a tweetstorm and action on Facebook.

Please share details far and wide to ensure maximum impact.

The first event may be followed by further action.
Picture
Week Two
Picture
4 Comments

PIP Assessment, traffic could cost you your award

16/1/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
Jayne Linney disabled rights campaigner in the UK writes:

Steve, a fellow campaigner was asked to support a PIP claimant who had been instructed by the DWP to attend an assessment in Walsall despite living in Birmingham; Steve raised this with his MP, the subsequent correspondence regarding is below:

Subject: Capita Assessment Centres
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:23:02 +0100
To: richard.burden.mp@parliament.uk

Mr Burden,
 I have been made aware that people are being asked to travel from Birmingham all the way to Walsall for their PIP medical assessment.

As you can fully appreciate some of these people have severe mobility issues as well as mental health issues and the distance they are being asked to travel will have a profound affect on the health.

 Could you please ask the minister for the disabled Rt Hon Justin Tomlinson to look into this further.

A rather interesting response was received:

As part of the specification for the PIP assessment service, Assessment Providers must provide sufficient suitable accommodation for face-to-face consultations. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has set clear requirements in terms of geography, travel, security and the claimant experience in relation to the sites used for PIP consultations.

The DWP requirement is that claimants do not have to travel for more than 90 minutes by public transport (single journey) to a consultation. However, this limit is an absolute maximum and for the majority of claimants their journey will be less than this.

The appointment letter includes a map and directions to the Assessment Centre. Where the claimant has a medical condition that makes travel difficult the claimant should discuss this with the Assessment Provider.

The DWP have specified circumstances where a home consultation will be offered, in particular where the claimant is unable to travel to a consultation as a result of their health conditions or impairments. More specifically home consultations could be offered when the claimant provides confirmation from their health professional that indicates they are unable to travel on health grounds.

When a claimant travels to a face-to-face consultation they are able to claim travel expenses for themselves and a companion, carer or young children who would otherwise be left unattended.
Payments can be made for public transport fares, travel by private motor vehicle and other costs relating to the journey to and from the consultation such as parking. There are circumstances in which taxi fares can be reimbursed. This should be discussed with the Assessment Provider before attending the consultation. Payments relating to other costs of the journey such as parking, tolls or congestion charges can also be met. Travel expenses will be reimbursed within 14 days of the claim but cannot be paid in advance or at the Assessment Centre.

Should a claimant have any difficulties attending a consultation they should discuss it with the Assessment Provider as soon as possible. If a claimant contacts the Assessment Provider in advance to advise they are unable to attend their consultation, they will be offered a second appointment. This may enable them to arrange for a companion to assist with their travel arrangements.

Justin Tomlinson MP
Minister for Disabled People

This raises an issue I’d not considered before, the DWP state “claimants do not have to travel for more than 90 minutes by public transport”  and as Steve says, and having lived in the area for over 8 years I concur, the problem with getting to Walsall from Birmingham is not the distance, which at around 13 mile should be within the DWP criteria but the fact that “getting to Walsall for an early morning appointment is “at a best a nightmare” even when the M6 is “at its quietest”; thus as Steve points out “potentially you could lose your award because of traffic problem”.

Steve raised the case thinking of using a private car but by public transport it is an even worse problem – consider you need a use a bus to get to train station (or as close as possible) then the train journey itself and finally the bus (if there is one) to the assessment centre. This could easily take more than 90 minutes, therefore your PIP award could rely on traffic?

Just to add final insult to injury you arrive at Walsall Assessment Centre to find it is  inaccessible for disabled people!

Jayne Linney
0 Comments

Petition for transitional state pension arrangements

13/1/2016

1 Comment

 
Picture
[Originally written October 29, 2016, there is one update "DWP response to state pension petition" which was received early November 2015 and the latest which was received January 13, 2016. The government has now said that it will debate this petition on February 1, 2016. You'll be able to watch online at parliamentlive.tv]

U.K. Petition: Make fair transitional state pension arrangements for 1950’s women

The Government must make fair transitional arrangements for all women born on or after 6th April 1951 who have unfairly borne the burden of the increase to the State Pension Age (SPA). Hundreds of thousands of women have had significant changes imposed on them with a lack of appropriate notification

The 1995 Conservative Government’s Pension Act included plans to increase women’s SPA to 65, the same as men’s. Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI), agree with equalisation, but don’t agree with the unfair way the changes were implemented – with little/no personal notice (1995/2011 Pension Acts), faster than promised (2011 Pension Act), and no time to make alternative plans.

Retirement plans have been shattered with devastating consequences.

In April 2015 NEWTEK posted the following report, shown below: New pensions bad news for many pensioners
The new flat rate State Retirement Pension was touted by the coalition government as much fairer than the old system with additional claims that it will help lift pensioners out of poverty.

But once again either the coalition got their figures wrong or they are simply telling lies.

Existing pensioners will stay on the old rate of pension with a lesser tax code adding to the financial pain. While younger pensioners will have had to work longer to get their new pension they will not have had to stack up as many years paying national insurance contributions as some existing pensioners.

But now we are learning that only 45% of all new pensioners will be eligible for the new flat rate increased pension.

It took a Freedom of Information request for the problem to come to light. Expect a future right-wing government to try to get rid of the Freedom of Information Act.

BBC News reports "A freedom of information request submitted by investment firm Hargreaves Lansdown reveals that 45% of those retiring between 2016 and 2020 will get the full amount."

That of course means that 55% will not be eligible.

The government has tried its usual damage limitations exercise claiming the 55% will not be worse off in real terms with means-tested top-ups for the poorest.

However as welfare reforms continue to bite and more cuts come into play that is another untruth.

Who can rely on State benefits in the UK remaining and at a decent level? The answer is no-one.

Cameron made vague promises previously about protecting pensioners from the austerity axe but with so many broken promises don't hold your breath.

Hot on the heels of attacks in Paris security and snooping was stepped up in the UK.

That will cost and it will not be the uber-rich who fund such measures. Not if we have a Tory led coalition in power.


But the two men who massacred people at the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris were already on Special Forces radar. That indicates enough information is being gathered but the problem lies with what security forces do with the information.

There are no indications that resurrecting the so-called snooping law in the UK would have led to a different outcome.


As for pensioners the Tories agenda has been slashing what it calls non-working benefits though I would argue most have been paid for over years of contributions into the system. I certainly do not class the State Pension as a 'welfare payment' not after paying into the system for too many years.

They will not want to alienate the 'grey-brigade' before the May 2015 General Election. After that time Cameron and Osborne have millions of pounds worth of further cuts planned--that is if they are returned to office.

What will a different government do about pensions? Time will tell.

The BBC report carries plenty of information to analyse and assess. Including:

Some with a private or workplace pension provision are contracted out of some of the state second pension, which is being integrated into the new flat-rate state pension. This means they will receive a lower amount. Others have a gap in their National Insurance contributions.

After April 2017, people will also have to work longer, making 35 years' worth of National Insurance (NI) contributions, rather than the current 30, to qualify for the full pension.

[Note at one time you needed 40 odd years and some older workers will have paid much more than 30 or 35 years worth]

Anyone who has paid NI for just a few years will not qualify for the new state pension at all. However, some carers receive NI credits despite being out of the workplace.


September 2015 update;
According to AOL "New state pension blow for women: hundreds of thousands miss out"
1 Comment

Nominate Abdul Sattar Edhi for Nobel Peace Prize 2016

12/1/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
A petition from Ziauddin Yousafzai, Birmingham, England:

Abdul Sattar Edhi is one of the most famous and well-respected people in Pakistan - a philanthropist, social activist and humanitarian. He has dedicated his life to helping others and his fleet of free ambulances have become a common feature of everyday life in Pakistan.

He is 87-years-old and this year I would like to see his life's work recognised with the Nobel Peace Prize.

When my daughter Malala won the Nobel Peace Prize my pride was immeasurable – words alone cannot express the overwhelming flood of emotions my wife and I felt. The award has elevated the profile and importance of education for every girl and every child globally. 

I believe Edhi deserves such an honour.


Edhi runs a nation-wide network of ambulances and emergency services. In a country where terrorism, poverty, natural disasters are a regular phenomenon, his foundation gives medical and emergency support to people all over Pakistan.

He gives shelter to orphaned children and the destitute, free medical care, drug rehabilitation services and disaster relief. In times of trouble Edhi’s ambulances roam where even the law enforcement agencies do not. Edhi has worked selflessly for several decades in serving the people of our great nation.  

Thanks to Edhi’s efforts, supported by his equally inspirational partner and wife, Bilquis Edhi, emergency and trauma care has been transformed in Pakistan and is now available to everyone irrespective of gender, class, caste, social standing or age.

As an educator, humanitarian and social activist, I have read about the essence of humanity but have only seen true humanity in motion through the efforts of Edhi and his Foundation.

With each passing day I am only too well aware of Edhi’s failing health, which began to rapidly deteriorate over the last twelve months. With this in mind, I would like to stress the urgency in Edhi being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016 in recognition of his services to the people of Pakistan.

He is not only a leading light in my home country, he is a global firebrand who will continue to lead the way in inspiring others through his legacy. Please show your support for Edhi by signing this petition and raising your voice with me for this living legend who has transformed the lives of so many and sets an example to each of us about how to live our lives.

Malala's support:
I'm signing this petition started by my father calling on our world leaders to nominate Abdul Sattar Edhi for the Nobel Peace Prize 2016. Abdul Sattar Edhi continues working tirelessly for humanity - he inspires me everyday! Edhi serves the most vulnerable, voiceless and unheard people in Pakistan.

He is a true role model for each and everyone of us. I urge you all to join me in honouring the work of Edhi and his Foundation.

Read the petition in English here Urdu here and in Pashto here.
0 Comments
<<Previous
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Tweet

    Yourvoice

    This blog will include a range of reports and opinion pieces covering many issues. It will be YOUR Voice.

    It launched two-days ahead of the UK General Election 2015 with an opinion piece about Labour and British wildlife.

    If you would like to post a report here  please contact the team.

    None of the posts are paid advertising-instead they cover a wide range of important issues with the occasional just for fun post thrown in for good measure.

    Note:- Some of the reports posted may also appear elsewhere online, posted by the actual writer or be press releases but all will share important issues and many will include petition links.

    Archives

    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015

    Categories

    All
    2016 US Elections
    38 Degrees
    Abdul Kuddus
    Abdul Sattar Edhi
    Abuse
    Airstrikes Syria
    Airwars
    Angry Dan
    Animal Abuse
    Animal Welfare
    Anti Austerity
    Anti Racism Demo
    Anti Semitism
    Arbitration
    Austerity Myth
    BBC Bias
    BDS
    Becky Ramsay
    Bees
    Ben Baddeley
    Big Corporation Hand Outs
    Big Corporations
    Blairite
    Blame Labour
    Blue For Bonnie
    B McPherson
    BNP
    Bonnie Armitage Death
    BRexit
    Brigitte Bardot Foundation
    Britain First Petition
    British Censorship
    British Elections
    British Fascism
    British Homelessness
    British Politics
    British Steel
    British Steel Pensions
    Bruce Springsteen
    Brussels
    Budget Cuts
    Calais Refugees
    Cameron In Lazarote
    Campaigning For Peace
    Chelley Ryan
    Child Abuse
    Child Detention Israel
    Chris Grayling
    Climate Change
    Compulsory Microchipping
    Copeland
    Corbyn Appeals To 50 Years Plus
    Corbyn Backstabbers
    Corbyn Rally Hull
    Corbyn Values
    Cruel Bull Fighting
    Cuba USA Relations
    Czech Republic
    Daniel Ryder
    David Cameron
    Digital Economy Bill
    Disability Rights
    Disabled Discrimination
    Dodgydavespmqs
    Donald Trump
    Donald Trump Rally
    Dont Bomb Syria
    Dont Spy On Us
    Dorothy Badrick
    Do Your Job John Bercow
    Drahonice
    DWP
    DWP Petition
    DWP Rules
    Education
    Education Protests
    Electoral Commission
    Electoral Reform
    Enbridge
    ESA Cuts
    EU Referendum
    EU Referendum Hype
    Fayetteville Trump Rally
    Fidel Castro Open Letter
    Fire And Rescue Service
    Fire Brigade Union
    First Nations
    Flesh Eating Disease
    Flood Rescue Service
    Fox Hunting
    Frederick James
    Freedom Of Panorama
    Friends Of Israel
    Galgo Appeal
    Gay Rights
    Gaza
    Gemma McCormick
    General Election 2015
    George Osborne Slasher
    Georgie Harrison
    Government Petitions
    Greenpeace News
    Help Ben Walk
    Hidden Crime
    Hillside Animal Sanctuary
    Homeless For Christmas
    Homelessness
    Hull Veterans
    Human Rights
    Hunters Death Shamefully Used
    Hunting Act
    Hunting Act Petition
    Hunting Ban
    Iain Duncan Smith
    Iain McNicol
    IDS Lies
    Indian News
    Inquiry Into Panama Papers
    Investigatory Powers Bill
    Iowa Rejects Trump
    Irish Democratic Party
    Islamaphobia
    Islamic State
    Jayne Linney
    Jeremy Corbyn
    Jeremy Corbyn Open Letter
    Jeremy Corbyn Statement On Syria
    Jeremy Corbyn Supporters
    Jeremy Hunt
    Jeremy Hunt Dimposition
    Jess Phillips
    Jo Cox Murder
    Johann Malawana
    John Healey
    John McDonnell
    Jonathan Lundgren
    Jordan Ray Correll
    Junior Doctors New Contracts
    Junior Doctors Strikes
    Karen Meanwell
    Ken Smollen
    Kids Abuse Puppy
    Killing Labour
    King Of Spain
    Labour 2020 Election Chances
    Labour Backstabbers
    Labour First
    Labour Leadership Hustings
    Labour Party
    Labour Party Conference Brighton
    Labour Party Open Letter
    Lawsuits
    Lee Wright
    Leishmaniasis Disease
    LEXIT
    LGBT Rights
    Local Elections
    Luke Akehurst
    Malia Bouattia
    Mangalore
    May Elections
    Mental G
    Mental Health
    Mental Health Britain
    Michael Dugher
    Microbeads
    Microchip Dogs
    Migration
    Mike Parsons
    Miners
    Miners Strike
    Momentum
    MPs Reject Panama Papers Inquiry
    National Censor
    NEC Candidates
    NEC Elections
    Never Trust A Tory
    New State Pension
    NHS Doctor
    NHS Privatisation
    NHS Strikes
    Nic Outterside
    Nobel Peace Prize Nominations
    North Carolina LGBT
    NUS
    Occupy UAL
    Oliver Letwin
    Oliver Letwin Event
    Online Censorship
    Online Encryption
    Online Privacy
    Open Letter
    Open Letter Reply
    Open Rights
    Open Rights Group
    Open Water Safety Campaign
    Owen Smith Event
    Paedphiles
    Palmyra
    Paris Terror Attacks
    Patricia Betty
    Peoples Assembly
    Petition
    Petition For Chunky
    PIP Assessment
    PLP Corbyn Demands
    PMqs
    Press Release
    Privatisation Of NHS
    Protesters
    Rachel Mulberg
    Refugee Camp
    Refugee Crisis
    Republican Vote
    RNLI
    Rob Galloway
    Robin Cook
    RSPCA
    Ruling Class
    Saudi King Extravagance
    Saudi Mass Executions
    Saudi Silences Protesters
    Save Our Libraries
    Save Our NHS
    Save The NHS
    Shell Abandons Arctic
    Shelter Osborne Petition
    Sir Ivan Rogers Quits
    Snoopers Charter
    Snooping
    Socialism
    Standing Rock
    Stand Up To Racism
    Stephen Doughty Resignation
    Stoke Central
    Stop The War
    Stop TPP
    Student Loan Sell Off
    Suicide
    SumOfUs
    Support Corbyn
    Surveillance Legislation
    Surveillance Powers
    Syria
    Tent City Hull
    Terry Mitchell
    The Labour Party Fight Is On
    To Do List
    Tooting Election
    Tortured Chunky
    Tory Backstabbing
    Tory Disarray
    Tory Election Fraud
    Tory Party In Crisis
    Trade Union Bill
    Trots
    Trump
    Trump Bad Loser
    Turing Law
    Tweetstorm
    University Cuts
    Vile IDS
    Vitamin Deficiency Health Risks
    War
    War On Want
    Weather On Day Born
    Women State Pensions
    Zofran

Click to set custom HTML
Support NEWTEK - Like what we do here at NEWTEK? If so, you should consider supporting us…
Running a news based website is fun, time consuming and can be costly. If you would like to help the site keep afloat please use the donate button
​
Sections:
News:
Welcome
Front page
Specials:

One Woman So Many Blogs


The Jeremy Corbyn Effect
​
NEWTEKWORLDNEWS:
About Us
Contact Us
Terms of Service
Cookie policy
Picture
  • Welcome
  • Latest
  • Animal Welfare
  • Barbara McPherson
  • Robert Weller
  • Dava Castillo
  • Odd News
  • Environment, science and health matters
  • On this day in History
  • About Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Cookie Policy
  • Welcome
  • Latest
  • Animal Welfare
  • Barbara McPherson
  • Robert Weller
  • Dava Castillo
  • Odd News
  • Environment, science and health matters
  • On this day in History
  • About Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Cookie Policy