Open Rights Group has responded to the publication of operational cases for the extensive surveillance powers laid out in the Investigatory Powers Act.
Executive Director Jim Killock said: “The government still hasn’t stated how it will respond to a CJEU ruling, which calls into question the legal basis for the current data retention regime. “The CJEU said that blanket data retention was not permissible and should only be used for serious crime. It also said that there needed to be independent authorisation for access to communications data. “The Government has yet to respond publicly to this ruling. It’s vital that the Government clarifies its position before the election.” ORG will deliver a letter to the Secretary of State and Shadow Ministers on Monday, urging the Government to present its plans before the election: https://action.openrightsgroup.org/investigatory-powers-act-government-must-come-clean-election The CJEU judgment relates to a case brought by Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, Tom Watson MP, over intrusive data retention powers in the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act (DRIPA). Open Rights Group intervened in the case together with Privacy International, arguing that DRIPA, which was rushed through parliament in 2014, was incompatible with EU law. While the judgment will no longer affect DRIPA, which expired at the end of 2016, it has major implications for the Investigatory Powers Act. In March, it appeared that the Government has accepted part of the CJEU ruling by issuing a tender on the UK Government Digital Marketplace, which called for businesses to help develop a new “independent communications data authorising body https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press/releases/2017/home-office-tender-suggests-government-has-accepted-cjeu-ruling-on-independent-authorisation-for-retained-data However, the Government has still not made a public statement about how it will respond to the judgement. More http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35810628 https://www.opendemocracy.net/digitaliberties/rebecca-vincent/theresa-may-britain-proposed-new-espionage-act-is-alarming
0 Comments
Following events in London last week British Home Secretary Amber Rudd has set her sights on the Internet.
The UK already has the most snooping in the western world but Mrs Rudd wants more. Monday we received the following communication from the Open Rights Group. "Yesterday, Home Secretary Amber Rudd told Andrew Marr that it was “completely unacceptable” that the Government was unable to read messages sent via services such as WhatsApp who offer end-to end encryption. The Government likes to position this as a question of privacy versus security. This is wrong. As we pointed out in today's Guardian [1], encryption keeps us safe online, undermining it will make us all less secure. It may seem like she is asking for something she doesn’t understand. But she is Home Secretary and her advisors know exactly what they want – to strip away any possibility of privacy wherever they can. And they know companies are a soft target. Rudd also told Marr that the Government wanted to tackle the promotion of extremist content online by talking to people “who understand the necessary hashtags to stop this stuff ever being put up”. We’re not quite sure what this means and we don’t think Rudd knows either. This is one of the reasons why ORG exists - to explain to MPs and the media how technology and the Internet work, and in doing so, to protect the digital rights of people in the UK. If Amber Rudd gets away with blaming WhatsApp for terrorism, then WhatsApp may well decide to remove safe and secure encryption, just in order to manage their own public image. We can’t challenge this without the support of our members. Please join ORG today and help us to fight for your digital rights. Best wishes, Jim Killock PS. My blog outlines the vast surveillance powers that the UK Government has to investigate and prevent terrorist attacks. [1] WhatsApp must be accessible to authorities, says Amber Rudd – The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/26/intelligence-services-access-whatsapp-amber-rudd-westminster-attack-encrypted-messaging _______________ Jim Killock Executive Director Open Rights Group" https://www.openrightsgroup.org/campaigns/ Labour now faces two important defensive by-elections in Copeland and Stoke Central. Both by-elections will be held on 23 February. I urge supporters of socialism to help in both contests. I am sure you will have been worried to see that Copeland CLP selected a local, 'moderate' (right wing) candidate, Cllr Gillian Troughton, rather than the Left alternatives. Disappointing. The candidate for Stoke Central has yet to be selected. Details as soon as they appear but in the meantime please contact the West Midlands Regional Labour Party for details of how to help: http://www.westmidlandslabour.org.uk/contact_details CLP decisions relating to Annual Conference In the meantime CLPs around the country are taking important internal decisions relating to the Labour Party Annual Conference. Progress are organising very hard, and we need a strong socialist presence to ensure Left Wing conference victories unlike in 2015 and 2016, and also to make sure that the Hard Right cannot again pass rule changes that would make it harder for socialists. Here is what we need you to do: 1. Find out the date when your CLP will be electing its conference delegate(s) – your CLP Secretary will be able to tell you this. 2. Make sure you have true socialist candidates ready to stand to be delegate(s) and that left wing members know this is a “must attend” meeting. This will involve getting active at Branch level. Momentum may be able to help. 3. Urge your CLP to not nominate either Michael Cashman and Gloria De Piero for re-election to the CLP section of the Conference Arrangements Committee (CAC), which is elected by One Member One Vote this summer. Their manifestos are seriously right wing. 4. Ask your CLP to definitely not nominate either Rose Burley or Kevin Hepworth for the CLP section of the National Constitutional Committee (NCC). CLPs can only nominate once for the two vacancies. This election takes place among CLP delegates at conference. Their manifestos are equally appalling The deadline for delegate registration and nominations is 23 June, but we would advise all CLPs to elect their delegates as early as possible, in case a snap General Election leads to a moratorium on party meetings or the right wing once again start banning meetings. CLPs send one delegate for the first 749 full members they had on 31 December 2016, and one further delegate for every additional 250 individual members in the constituency or part thereof. At least every second delegate from a CLP has to be a woman; where only one delegate is appointed this must be a woman at least in every other year. Where the individual women’s membership in a constituency is 100 or more, an additional woman delegate may be appointed. Where the individual Young Labour membership in a constituency is 30 or more an additional delegate under the age of 27 may be appointed. CLPs do not need to send their full delegation entitlement, their card vote remains the same value even if they just send one delegate. Each CLP’s delegation votes as a block, casting a card vote equivalent to its membership on most key votes, so the key objective is to ensure that a majority of your CLP’s delegates are Corbyn supporting socialists Cheers. P.S. please do copy and forward this to your friends and encourage them to get involved in making Labour a socialist movement once more. Thank You. The following has been shared with us as it was received in an email and asks the recipient to "share." It is from the right-wing of the Labour Party and a group called Labour First; a group that would call themselves Labour moderates!
**************************** Help Labour win in Copeland and Stoke Central Labour now faces two important defensive by-elections in Copeland and Stoke Central. Both by-elections will be held on 23 February. We urge supporters of Labour First to help in both contests. I am sure you will have been pleased to see that Copeland CLP selected a local, experienced, moderate candidate, Cllr Gillian Troughton, rather than the Hard Left alternatives. Richard Angell of Progress exposes the attempted stitch-up that Gillian had to overcome here: . Gillian's selection increases Labour’s chances of holding a seat where the main industry is nuclear power. If you are able to visit Copeland to help in the campaign here are all the details: http://www.copelandlabour.org.uk/get_involved The candidate for Stoke Central has yet to be selected. We will circulate details as soon as we have them but in the meantime please contact the West Midlands Regional Labour Party for details of how to help: http://www.westmidlandslabour.org.uk/contact_details CLP decisions relating to Annual Conference In the meantime CLPs around the country are taking important internal decisions relating to Labour Party Annual Conference. Momentum are organising very hard, and we need a strong moderate presence to repeat our conference victories in 2015 and 2016 and ensure that the Hard Left cannot pass a rule change that would make it easier for John McDonnell to become Labour Party Leader after Jeremy Corbyn by reducing the percentage of MPs needed to meet the nomination threshold. Here is what we need you to do: 1. Let us know now by replying to this email the date when your CLP will be electing its conference delegate(s) – your CLP Secretary will be able to tell you this. 2. Make sure you have moderate candidates ready to stand to be delegate(s) and that moderate members know this is a “must attend” meeting. 3. Ask your CLP to nominate both of Michael Cashman and Gloria De Piero for re-election to the CLP section of the Conference Arrangements Committee (CAC), which is elected by One Member One Vote this summer. Their manifestoes are here to circulate and print off: https://gallery.mailchimp.com/271f6fffa61efcfd965911e04/images/cadda2cd-7083-407e-8dc1-f3dc94bc3f54.png and https://gallery.mailchimp.com/271f6fffa61efcfd965911e04/images/db54713b-6ddb-4c13-8be8-419e3f2e2dbc.png 4. Ask your CLP to nominate either Rose Burley or Kevin Hepworth for the CLP section of the National Constitutional Committee (NCC). CLPs can only nominate once for the two vacancies. This election takes place among CLP delegates at conference. Their manifestoes are here for your to circulate and print off: https://gallery.mailchimp.com/271f6fffa61efcfd965911e04/images/5853166d-47f4-45fe-b52a-e3a98d5fc8ae.jpg and https://gallery.mailchimp.com/271f6fffa61efcfd965911e04/images/3f48724c-e852-4a11-91c3-d3e55ee330e4.jpg 5. Email us at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) to let us know the results from your CLP! The deadline for delegate registration and nominations is 23 June, but we would advise all CLPs to elect their delegates as early as possible, in case a snap General Election leads to a moratorium on party meetings. CLPs send one delegate for the first 749 full members they had on 31 December 2016, and one further delegate for every additional 250 individual members in the constituency or part thereof. At least every second delegate from a CLP has to be a woman; where only one delegate is appointed this must be a woman at least in every other year. Where the individual women’s membership in a constituency is 100 or more, an additional woman delegate may be appointed. Where the individual Young Labour membership in a constituency is 30 or more an additional delegate under the age of 27 may be appointed. CLPs do not need to send their full delegation entitlement, their card vote remains the same value even if they just send one delegate. Each CLP’s delegation votes as a block, casting a card vote equivalent to its membership on most key votes, so the key objective is to ensure that a majority of your CLP’s delegates are moderates. Unite General Secretary Election Many of you have asked how you can help Gerard Coyne’s campaign to win the Unite General Secretary election. You can sign up to support Gerard’s campaign here: http://www.votegerardcoyne.co.uk. Best wishes, Luke Luke Akehurst Secretary, Labour First P.S. please do forward this email to your friends and encourage them to join our mailing list by signing up here: eepurl.com/Nzh75" *********************************************** Feel free to comment but without website links thanks. For me this divisive communication from Labour First is a clear message but it is not one of Unity. http://www.thejeremycorbyneffect.com/jeremy-corbyn-blog/copeland-and-stoke-two-by-elections-on-same-day David Cameron delivered on his election promise of an EU in or out referendum but when the people selected BRexit he turned tail and ran. Unelected Prime Minister of the UK Theresa May is left picking up the pieces and that task is getting more difficult by the day. Tuesday the UK's ambassador to the European Union, Sir Ivan Rogers, has resigned. His full resignation message to his staff follows: Dear All, Press release: Open Rights Group
Social media platforms such as Twitter could be forced to block accounts if they are linked to porn sites that fail to verify the age of their users. Proposals in the Digital Economy Bill will allow the BBFC to compel Internet Service Providers to block websites that don’t comply with age verification. Ancillary services - such as payment providers or advertisers - will also be forced to stop providing services to these sites. The Government has confirmed that the term “ancillary services” can include any service that facilitates a non-compliant publisher, including social media platforms such as Twitter. This would mean that a Twitter account that links to a non-compliant porn site could be blocked to UK users. However, accounts from BBFC compliant sites won’t be blocked and will be able to post pornography to their Twitter feeds even if under 18s can see it. Executive Director Jim Killock said: “The Government started with age verification, moved onto web censorship and now wants to block Twitter accounts.” “While these proposals are damaging for free speech, they are also absurd. Some Twitter accounts could be blocked for being associated with a porn site while others will be freely able to share pornography to Twitter users of any age.” It has been estimated that one in every thousand tweets is porn: https://www.channel4.com/news/one-in-every-thousand-tweets-is-porn Notes to Editors From the Digital Economy Bill second reading: https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2016-12-13/debates/21321771-1932-4684-8088-F5F24B42FF73/DigitalEconomyBill Lord Ashton of Hyde Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) said: “The Government believe that services, including Twitter, can be classified by regulators as ancillary service providers where they are enabling or facilitating the making available of pornographic or prohibited material. This means that they could be notified of commercial pornographers to whom they provide a service but this will not apply to material provided on a non-commercial basis.” Baroness Benjamin said: “I was particularly delighted that the noble Baroness, Lady Shields, confirmed to the Lords Communications Committee on 29 November that: “The Bill covers ancillary services. There was a question about Twitter. Twitter is a user-generated uploading-content site. If there is pornography on Twitter, it will be considered covered under ancillary services”. |
Yourvoice
This blog will include a range of reports and opinion pieces covering many issues. It will be YOUR Voice. Archives
April 2017
Categories
All
|