NEWTEKWORLDNEWS
Menu

The late Robin Cook's Iraq war resignation speech

6/7/2016

1 Comment

 
Picture
Picture
Labour MP Robin Cook resigned from his positions as Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons on March 17 , 2003, in protest against the invasion of Iraq. In early August 2005, Cook and his wife, Gaynor, took a two-week holiday in the Highlands of Scotland. At around 2:20 pm, on August 6, 2005, whilst walking down Ben Stack in Scotland, Cook suddenly suffered a severe heart attack, collapsed, lost consciousness and fell about 8 feet (2.4 m) down a ridge.

He was assisted after his fall by another hill-walker who refused all publicity and was granted anonymity.

It took a rescue helicopter 30 minutes to arrive. Robin Cook was dead aged 58.

Suspicions about the death of Robin Cook linger on.

On the day the Chilcot Inquiry report into the Iraq War is finally published we have published Mr Cook's 2003 resignation speech below:
Watch the speech

Here is the full text of Robin Cook's resignation speech in the House of Commons, which won applause from some backbenchers in unprecedented Commons scenes.

This is the first time for 20 years that I have addressed the House from the back benches.

I must confess that I had forgotten how much better the view is from here.

None of those 20 years were more enjoyable or more rewarding than the past two, in which I have had the immense privilege of serving this House as Leader of the House, which were made all the more enjoyable, Mr Speaker, by the opportunity of working closely with you.

It was frequently the necessity for me as Leader of the House to talk my way out of accusations that a statement had been preceded by a press interview.

On this occasion I can say with complete confidence that no press interview has been given before this statement.
I have chosen to address the House first on why I cannot support a war without international agreement or domestic support.

Backing Blair
The present Prime Minister is the most successful leader of the Labour party in my lifetime.

I hope that he will continue to be the leader of our party, and I hope that he will continue to be successful. I have no sympathy with, and I will give no comfort to, those who want to use this crisis to displace him.

I applaud the heroic efforts that the prime minister has made in trying to secure a second resolution.

I do not think that anybody could have done better than the foreign secretary in working to get support for a second resolution within the Security Council.

But the very intensity of those attempts underlines how important it was to succeed.

Now that those attempts have failed, we cannot pretend that getting a second resolution was of no importance.

French intransigence?
France has been at the receiving end of bucket loads of commentary in recent days.

It is not France alone that wants more time for inspections. Germany wants more time for inspections; Russia wants more time for inspections; indeed, at no time have we signed up even the minimum necessary to carry a second resolution.

We delude ourselves if we think that the degree of international hostility is all the result of President Chirac.

The reality is that Britain is being asked to embark on a war without agreement in any of the international bodies of which we are a leading partner - not NATO, not the European Union and, now, not the Security Council.

To end up in such diplomatic weakness is a serious reverse.

Only a year ago, we and the United States were part of a coalition against terrorism that was wider and more diverse than I would ever have imagined possible.

'Heavy price'
History will be astonished at the diplomatic miscalculations that led so quickly to the disintegration of that powerful coalition.

The US can afford to go it alone, but Britain is not a superpower.

Our interests are best protected not by unilateral action but by multilateral agreement and a world order governed by rules.

Yet tonight the international partnerships most important to us are weakened: the European Union is divided; the Security Council is in stalemate.

Those are heavy casualties of a war in which a shot has yet to be fired.

I have heard some parallels between military action in these circumstances and the military action that we took in Kosovo. There was no doubt about the multilateral support that we had for the action that we took in Kosovo.

It was supported by NATO; it was supported by the European Union; it was supported by every single one of the seven neighbours in the region. France and Germany were our active allies.

It is precisely because we have none of that support in this case that it was all the more important to get agreement in the Security Council as the last hope of demonstrating international agreement.

Public doubts
The legal basis for our action in Kosovo was the need to respond to an urgent and compelling humanitarian crisis.
Our difficulty in getting support this time is that neither the international community nor the British public is persuaded that there is an urgent and compelling reason for this military action in Iraq.

The threshold for war should always be high.

None of us can predict the death toll of civilians from the forthcoming bombardment of Iraq, but the US warning of a bombing campaign that will "shock and awe" makes it likely that casualties will be numbered at least in the thousands.
I am confident that British servicemen and women will acquit themselves with professionalism and with courage. I hope that they all come back.

I hope that Saddam, even now, will quit Baghdad and avert war, but it is false to argue that only those who support war support our troops.

It is entirely legitimate to support our troops while seeking an alternative to the conflict that will put those troops at risk.

Nor is it fair to accuse those of us who want longer for inspections of not having an alternative strategy.

For four years as foreign secretary I was partly responsible for the western strategy of containment.

Over the past decade that strategy destroyed more weapons than in the Gulf war, dismantled Iraq's nuclear weapons programme and halted Saddam's medium and long-range missiles programmes.

Iraq's military strength is now less than half its size than at the time of the last Gulf war.

Threat questioned
Ironically, it is only because Iraq's military forces are so weak that we can even contemplate its invasion. Some advocates of conflict claim that Saddam's forces are so weak, so demoralised and so badly equipped that the war will be over in a few days.

We cannot base our military strategy on the assumption that Saddam is weak and at the same time justify pre-emptive action on the claim that he is a threat.

Iraq probably has no weapons of mass destruction in the commonly understood sense of the term - namely a credible device capable of being delivered against a strategic city target.

It probably still has biological toxins and battlefield chemical munitions, but it has had them since the 1980s when US companies sold Saddam anthrax agents and the then British Government approved chemical and munitions factories.
Why is it now so urgent that we should take military action to disarm a military capacity that has been there for 20 years, and which we helped to create?

Why is it necessary to resort to war this week, while Saddam's ambition to complete his weapons programme is blocked by the presence of UN inspectors?

Israeli breaches
Only a couple of weeks ago, Hans Blix told the Security Council that the key remaining disarmament tasks could be completed within months.

I have heard it said that Iraq has had not months but 12 years in which to complete disarmament, and that our patience is exhausted.

Yet it is more than 30 years since resolution 242 called on Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories.

We do not express the same impatience with the persistent refusal of Israel to comply.

I welcome the strong personal commitment that the prime minister has given to middle east peace, but Britain's positive role in the middle east does not redress the strong sense of injustice throughout the Muslim world at what it sees as one rule for the allies of the US and another rule for the rest.

Nor is our credibility helped by the appearance that our partners in Washington are less interested in disarmament than they are in regime change in Iraq.

That explains why any evidence that inspections may be showing progress is greeted in Washington not with satisfaction but with consternation: it reduces the case for war.

Presidential differences
What has come to trouble me most over past weeks is the suspicion that if the hanging chads in Florida had gone the other way and Al Gore had been elected, we would not now be about to commit British troops.

The longer that I have served in this place, the greater the respect I have for the good sense and collective wisdom of the British people.

On Iraq, I believe that the prevailing mood of the British people is sound. They do not doubt that Saddam is a brutal dictator, but they are not persuaded that he is a clear and present danger to Britain.

They want inspections to be given a chance, and they suspect that they are being pushed too quickly into conflict by a US Administration with an agenda of its own.

Above all, they are uneasy at Britain going out on a limb on a military adventure without a broader international coalition and against the hostility of many of our traditional allies.

From the start of the present crisis, I have insisted, as Leader of the House, on the right of this place to vote on whether Britain should go to war.

It has been a favourite theme of commentators that this House no longer occupies a central role in British politics.
Nothing could better demonstrate that they are wrong than for this House to stop the commitment of troops in a war that has neither international agreement nor domestic support.

I intend to join those tomorrow night who will vote against military action now. It is for that reason, and for that reason alone, and with a heavy heart, that I resign from the government.
There are also suspicions about the death of weapon's inspector Dr David Kelly - http://www.tekjournalismuk.com/only-in-the-uk/just-why-are-details-of-dr-kellys-death-still-hidden

http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2859431.stm
1 Comment
bob
22/7/2016 12:16:11 am

scapegoat and strange a man of 58 died so suddenly-and what about dr david kelly-blair is a total scumbag and has only been george w bush,s plaything-two total moron,s who should never have held power.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Tweet

    Yourvoice

    This blog will include a range of reports and opinion pieces covering many issues. It will be YOUR Voice.

    It launched two-days ahead of the UK General Election 2015 with an opinion piece about Labour and British wildlife.

    If you would like to post a report here  please contact the team.

    None of the posts are paid advertising-instead they cover a wide range of important issues with the occasional just for fun post thrown in for good measure.

    Note:- Some of the reports posted may also appear elsewhere online, posted by the actual writer or be press releases but all will share important issues and many will include petition links.

    Archives

    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015

    Categories

    All
    2016 US Elections
    38 Degrees
    Abdul Kuddus
    Abdul Sattar Edhi
    Abuse
    Airstrikes Syria
    Airwars
    Angry Dan
    Animal Abuse
    Animal Welfare
    Anti Austerity
    Anti Racism Demo
    Anti Semitism
    Arbitration
    Austerity Myth
    BBC Bias
    BDS
    Becky Ramsay
    Bees
    Ben Baddeley
    Big Corporation Hand Outs
    Big Corporations
    Blairite
    Blame Labour
    Blue For Bonnie
    B McPherson
    BNP
    Bonnie Armitage Death
    BRexit
    Brigitte Bardot Foundation
    Britain First Petition
    British Censorship
    British Elections
    British Fascism
    British Homelessness
    British Politics
    British Steel
    British Steel Pensions
    Bruce Springsteen
    Brussels
    Budget Cuts
    Calais Refugees
    Cameron In Lazarote
    Campaigning For Peace
    Chelley Ryan
    Child Abuse
    Child Detention Israel
    Chris Grayling
    Climate Change
    Compulsory Microchipping
    Copeland
    Corbyn Appeals To 50 Years Plus
    Corbyn Backstabbers
    Corbyn Rally Hull
    Corbyn Values
    Cruel Bull Fighting
    Cuba USA Relations
    Czech Republic
    Daniel Ryder
    David Cameron
    Digital Economy Bill
    Disability Rights
    Disabled Discrimination
    Dodgydavespmqs
    Donald Trump
    Donald Trump Rally
    Dont Bomb Syria
    Dont Spy On Us
    Dorothy Badrick
    Do Your Job John Bercow
    Drahonice
    DWP
    DWP Petition
    DWP Rules
    Education
    Education Protests
    Electoral Commission
    Electoral Reform
    Enbridge
    ESA Cuts
    EU Referendum
    EU Referendum Hype
    Fayetteville Trump Rally
    Fidel Castro Open Letter
    Fire And Rescue Service
    Fire Brigade Union
    First Nations
    Flesh Eating Disease
    Flood Rescue Service
    Fox Hunting
    Frederick James
    Freedom Of Panorama
    Friends Of Israel
    Galgo Appeal
    Gay Rights
    Gaza
    Gemma McCormick
    General Election 2015
    George Osborne Slasher
    Georgie Harrison
    Government Petitions
    Greenpeace News
    Help Ben Walk
    Hidden Crime
    Hillside Animal Sanctuary
    Homeless For Christmas
    Homelessness
    Hull Veterans
    Human Rights
    Hunters Death Shamefully Used
    Hunting Act
    Hunting Act Petition
    Hunting Ban
    Iain Duncan Smith
    Iain McNicol
    IDS Lies
    Indian News
    Inquiry Into Panama Papers
    Investigatory Powers Bill
    Iowa Rejects Trump
    Irish Democratic Party
    Islamaphobia
    Islamic State
    Jayne Linney
    Jeremy Corbyn
    Jeremy Corbyn Open Letter
    Jeremy Corbyn Statement On Syria
    Jeremy Corbyn Supporters
    Jeremy Hunt
    Jeremy Hunt Dimposition
    Jess Phillips
    Jo Cox Murder
    Johann Malawana
    John Healey
    John McDonnell
    Jonathan Lundgren
    Jordan Ray Correll
    Junior Doctors New Contracts
    Junior Doctors Strikes
    Karen Meanwell
    Ken Smollen
    Kids Abuse Puppy
    Killing Labour
    King Of Spain
    Labour 2020 Election Chances
    Labour Backstabbers
    Labour First
    Labour Leadership Hustings
    Labour Party
    Labour Party Conference Brighton
    Labour Party Open Letter
    Lawsuits
    Lee Wright
    Leishmaniasis Disease
    LEXIT
    LGBT Rights
    Local Elections
    Luke Akehurst
    Malia Bouattia
    Mangalore
    May Elections
    Mental G
    Mental Health
    Mental Health Britain
    Michael Dugher
    Microbeads
    Microchip Dogs
    Migration
    Mike Parsons
    Miners
    Miners Strike
    Momentum
    MPs Reject Panama Papers Inquiry
    National Censor
    NEC Candidates
    NEC Elections
    Never Trust A Tory
    New State Pension
    NHS Doctor
    NHS Privatisation
    NHS Strikes
    Nic Outterside
    Nobel Peace Prize Nominations
    North Carolina LGBT
    NUS
    Occupy UAL
    Oliver Letwin
    Oliver Letwin Event
    Online Censorship
    Online Encryption
    Online Privacy
    Open Letter
    Open Letter Reply
    Open Rights
    Open Rights Group
    Open Water Safety Campaign
    Owen Smith Event
    Paedphiles
    Palmyra
    Paris Terror Attacks
    Patricia Betty
    Peoples Assembly
    Petition
    Petition For Chunky
    PIP Assessment
    PLP Corbyn Demands
    PMqs
    Press Release
    Privatisation Of NHS
    Protesters
    Rachel Mulberg
    Refugee Camp
    Refugee Crisis
    Republican Vote
    RNLI
    Rob Galloway
    Robin Cook
    RSPCA
    Ruling Class
    Saudi King Extravagance
    Saudi Mass Executions
    Saudi Silences Protesters
    Save Our Libraries
    Save Our NHS
    Save The NHS
    Shell Abandons Arctic
    Shelter Osborne Petition
    Sir Ivan Rogers Quits
    Snoopers Charter
    Snooping
    Socialism
    Standing Rock
    Stand Up To Racism
    Stephen Doughty Resignation
    Stoke Central
    Stop The War
    Stop TPP
    Student Loan Sell Off
    Suicide
    SumOfUs
    Support Corbyn
    Surveillance Legislation
    Surveillance Powers
    Syria
    Tent City Hull
    Terry Mitchell
    The Labour Party Fight Is On
    To Do List
    Tooting Election
    Tortured Chunky
    Tory Backstabbing
    Tory Disarray
    Tory Election Fraud
    Tory Party In Crisis
    Trade Union Bill
    Trots
    Trump
    Trump Bad Loser
    Turing Law
    Tweetstorm
    University Cuts
    Vile IDS
    Vitamin Deficiency Health Risks
    War
    War On Want
    Weather On Day Born
    Women State Pensions
    Zofran

Click to set custom HTML
Support NEWTEK - Like what we do here at NEWTEK? If so, you should consider supporting us…
Running a news based website is fun, time consuming and can be costly. If you would like to help the site keep afloat please use the donate button
​
Sections:
News:
Welcome
Front page
Specials:

One Woman So Many Blogs


The Jeremy Corbyn Effect
​
NEWTEKWORLDNEWS:
About Us
Contact Us
Terms of Service
Cookie policy
Picture
  • Welcome
  • Latest
  • Animal Welfare
  • Barbara McPherson
  • Robert Weller
  • Dava Castillo
  • Odd News
  • Environment, science and health matters
  • On this day in History
  • About Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Cookie Policy
  • Welcome
  • Latest
  • Animal Welfare
  • Barbara McPherson
  • Robert Weller
  • Dava Castillo
  • Odd News
  • Environment, science and health matters
  • On this day in History
  • About Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Cookie Policy