This government’s record on environmental protection has come under fire for its enthusiastic support of the Alberta Oil Sands and for proposals to build pipelines to carry the products to the coasts. Their financial plans have also been thrown into disarray by the precipitous drop in world petroleum prices. In the past eight months, the value of Canadian currency has dropped about 25% in relation to the US currency.
Polls taken to test the will of the electorate have not given the Conservatives comfort.
There are three major parties in the race. The New Democratic Party (NDP) is headed by Thomas Mulcair and the Liberals headed by Justin Trudeau. The fourth party with sitting members is the Green Party headed by Elizabeth May. In Quebec the Bloc Quebecois headed by Giles Duceppe. He is not seated. In Canada, independents may run and if elected are seated.
The NDP was the official opposition in the now dissolved government.
It is difficult to pin down the most important plank in each party’s platform. The following statements were gleaned from the official web site. I chose to select the statement/slogan that was placed first.
Conservative Party of Canada – protecting Canadians from the threat of terror
NDP – ready for change
Liberal – it’s time for real change
Green – a Canada that works. Together
Bloc Quebecois – Their page does not translate well from the French. They are the party that maintains that the Province of Quebec should separate from the rest of Canada. They run only in that province.
While each party must pay for its campaign out of party funds, the election process is expensive to the taxpayer as well. An early call of 11 weeks means that the bureaucratic process must gear up early as well with all its attendant expenses.
The election will take place October 19.
OK so that marks two people as insensitive to the equality of all. Other passengers offered to change seats and the plane took off.
She pointed out that she was being considered unfit to be a seat partner by this religious extremist solely on the basis that she is female.
It is my opinion that the disruptive man should have been told to sit down and be quiet or get off the plane. That may seem extreme when other passengers could accommodate his wishes.
If you don’t see the problem here, think about a NeoNazi in full regalia boarding a passenger plane. His assigned seat is next to a person of colour, who in his twisted mind, considers it wrong to sit next to a person of colour. Would the cabin crew been as quick to accommodate the NeoNazi? How about another type of religious zealot who won’t sit next to a Jewish person? Or a gay or lesbian person? Why is it ok to accommodate a misogynist?
You may think this is a one of, but that isn’t the case. The New York Times, April 9 of this year has reported numerous cases of this. This phenomenon also extends to religious extremists wanting separate buses and streets and erasing women's photos from news stories.
Of course people are entitled to believe whatever they believe, but in a free, democratic society they cannot be permitted to impose those strange or wonderful beliefs on others.
Christine Flynn deserves a heartfelt aplology.
Like this writer's work - please donate
Blogger, gardener, farmer. Working toward food security and a 30 foot
diet. Addicted to reading. Love this planet, especially my little corner
on Vancouver Island, Canada
Running a news based website is fun, time consuming and can be costly. If you would like to help the site keep afloat please use the donate button